Friday, August 10, 2007

Any Excuse

to close public rights of way illegally. There's such an epidemic of this activity in the Surrey Hills. Someone should let these people know that they don't own or administer public rights of way. They can't unilaterally open and close them as they see fit.





I completely appreciate the fear that this latest outbreak is causing. If you have years of work and hundreds of thousands of pounds tied up in your herd it's enough to make anyone unreasonable. It's still not reason enough to break the law.

Thursday, August 02, 2007

Swifter than eagles. And stolen. By Boris Johnson

First there was shock. Then there was grief. Then rage. There was a moment of shock when I rounded the corner the other night because, no matter how often it has happened to you, it is always a gulp-making thing to look at the railings where you left your bike, and see that for the seventh time in as many years some cowardly little fiend has used a combination of violence and ingenuity to steal it.

There was grief as I remembered what a lovely bike it was. It was swifter than eagles, it was stronger than lions. It was a silver-grey Marin Sausalito with featherlight wishbone struts and, with tyres pumped and a following wind, it was a two-wheeled Desert Orchid, capable of surging from Highbury to the House of Commons in less than 20 minutes.

And after the mourning the rage kicked in: rage at the epidemic of bike theft that is gripping London and the rest of the country - and rage at our society for the lax, passive, apathetic way in which we are dealing with that epidemic.

We treat bike theft as though it were a kind of natural event, like catching a cold or succumbing to some other morally neutral phenomenon.

When someone's bicycle is stolen the discussion is entirely about what he or she could have done to prevent it. The police talk about the need for tougher locks, and special serial numbers, and the cycling experts give out various bits of anti-theft advice. Don't have a bike that's too flash, they say. Try painting it some depressing colour, like orange or purple. Try having a basket at the front, they say, or mudguards, or anything to make your bike look a bit grungy and unappealing.

All of which advice may be well meant, but somehow makes me pop with rage, because we seem continually to be ascribing responsibility for the event to the victim, and ignoring the critical point. It wasn't some supernatural agency that nicked your bike, or nicked my bike. It wasn't oompa-loompas or fairies or bike elves. It was thieves.

It was a bunch of cynical little sods who don't care a toss for private property, and it so happens that, on this occasion, I had taken just about every possible precaution. It was no ordinary lock I used to immobilise my machine: it was a huge steel thing made in Germany, as thick as a baby's arm, and I locked it to some railings and, as I stood back to admire my handiwork, I noted that both were far too thick to saw through.

So what did they do? They uprooted a large stake that was being used to encourage the growth of some sapling, and they jemmied it into the railings and heaved and heaved until they snapped the bar, and then scarpered with my bike and left their wreckage contemptuously on the pavement; and yes, it is true that this city needs more Sheffield stands to park our bikes, but you ought to be able to lock your bike to London railings, with a drop-forged German mega-lock, and not come back to find that someone has nicked it with an audacity that can only be described as insolent.

There were 80,000 bicycle thefts in London last year, and that figure is probably a gross underestimate. Why? Let me quote the words of a passer-by who came upon me, as the emotions of shock-grief-rage were flashing across my face like a traffic light. "Bastards!" he said. "That happened to me last year, but it's no use reporting it to the police, because they won't do a thing about it."

And even if he is wrong, even if there is occasionally an effort to take bike theft seriously, you can see - on the face of it - why the police do not put it top of their priorities. The scale of the problem is appalling. There are only a million regular cyclists in this country, and yet there were 439,000 bicycles stolen last year, and that is just the ones reported stolen. One cycling expert told me he sometimes hoped the thieves would just give up in exhaustion, overwhelmed by the scale of their booty, unable to find any more punters for their ripped-off merchandise.

But they don't give up: the internet offers huge new markets; Brick Lane is bursting on a Sunday. The plunder intensifies, and every bike stolen is not just a bout of shock-grief-rage for the victim; every theft is a deterrent to cycling, since it is estimated that 25 per cent of victims decide not to bother investing in a new bicycle.

These are dismal statistics, and yet for the victims of bike theft the police seem to take the attitude of the Amsterdam cops played by Harry Enfield and Paul Whitehouse: they have solved the problem by decriminalising it.

Suppose they were to find a 15-year-old in possession of my Marin Sausalito, or a roomful of Marin Sausalitos. What could the perp expect? A caution? A stiff talking-to? Some unenforceable ASBO? The double-standards are unbearable, because we all know perfectly law-abiding citizens who have allowed their offside front wheel to stray an inch outside the white line of the residents' parking bay and boom!

Their car is towed away by the state, and they can end up paying hundreds of pounds to get it back. But when a thief nicks your bicycle, the state just seems to shrug its shoulders and advise you to get more locks. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could change the odds, and wipe the confident smirk off the faces of these varmints? Isn't it time we investigated the uses of new cheap tracking technology, to fill these thieves with the terror of getting caught? Wouldn't it be fine to hunt down the middlemen - often drug-dealers - who encourage kids to go on their nicking sprees?

It would be a huge advance for civility and decency on the streets, because little crimes lead to greater crimes, and if you can casually smash a railing to steal a bike, then you are well on the way to burglary and worse. Decoy bikes will be part of the answer; but the first step is to recondition society to grasp this elementary fact, that the problem is not caused by bad locks or weak railings. It's caused by thieves, and they need to be deterred.

Boris Johnson is MP for Henley

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

You're Carrying HOW MUCH???

It's time, it appears, to re-assess how much stuff I carry around with me on the bike. I've spend mucho cash on a superlight hardtail Spesh and have Spesh Pro Armadillos which are so ludicrously light that I sometimes think the bike will invert itself whilst parked. I'm no lightweight though, and could lose several stones without really noticing. I carry two panniers at all times which contain my emergency kit (all packed into a mini First Aid pack:

Nurofen Meltlets (ibuprofen which can be taken without water)
Pack of Slime Scabs
Pack of Park self-adhesive patches
Length of black duck tape folded into itself
Kendal Mint Cake
Pack of tissues
Triangular bandage
Normal bandage
4 x Mediwipes
2 x sealed tampons
Vinyl gloves
Snub-nosed scissors
Twenty-three pounds in cash
Pack of assorted plasters
Pack of white medical tape
Re-sus face shield
Pack of Wet Ones

Also in my pannier lives a Topeak Morph pump, pre-Slimed inner tube, plastic bags, Topeak multitool, tyre levers, a fork (the tines of which are used to push the valve in to clear it of bits of Slime if the tyre needs more air en route), Crank Bros Speed Lever, cable lock, and a small pack of tissues.

All of the above is taken out with me on every ride as a minimum. Sounds crazy and over the top? The problem is, each and every object has shown it's worth "in the field" on at least one occasion. I mean, a headache can really ruin your ride, as can hands covered in dog poo after you've ridden through some and then get visited by those pesky f*aeries for a CDE* or two.

Add all the bits that I need to take for work, and that adds up to quite a lot of kit. And I wonder why I don't seem to be able to break the 10mph average for a 20 mile off-road ride! (Admittedly, the lack of full sus probably has more to do with that.)

I can't think how to rationalise it. All the extra space to be able to put sarnies and spare clothing in case it turns chilly is most useful too. I can't understand how those racing snakes manage to get by with nothing but some flimsy lycra and a wedgie.

* CDE = Catastrophic Deflation Event of the pneumatic kind